/
RSS Feed
In December’s HELD V. MONTANA case, the state’s highest court ruled that Montana must account for global greenhouse gas emissions in the permitting of projects. What does that mean? What are the potential impacts of the case? Will this be a hay day for environmental lawfare?
There are plenty of impacts, and plenty of questions that make take a decade or more to answer in regards to what the ruling will mean. Click on the podcast, as environmental lawyer, Matthew Dolphay, a partner in the law firm Holland & Hart, who was involved in the case, unpacks the ruling and the potential impacts in a very informative discussion on Voices of Montana.